Money - who needs it? Not us, thankfully. ;-)

(we are in the process of dividing this article into separate subjects of relevance, as that which often happens during revelation conveyance - that of a constant inflow of information and expansion - has, and this now needs to be addressed in various separate areas. In the interim, here is this article as originally revealed. It is to be amended and altered, so this will not be a final version of the revelation - unless of course this incarnation ceases being capable of conveying the revelation prior to updating it. If such happens, then this is to be considered an acceptable final copy and the revelation fulfilled. As long as you see notes such as this as the revelation occurs, that means it is a growing and unveiling thing, and so you can continue discerning amendments and alterations as cannonical - until the right of succession has ceased).

One of the first things the skeptical-minded tend to suspect when encountering someone claiming to be a being such as a Bodhisattva is that it's going to be about conning people, exploitation, money. We feel it necessary to confirm at the outset that this revelation, however big it gets or small it remains, will never be about money. We have no need of it, do not solicit and cannot, in fact, accept donations. If ever this message changes, you will know that this particular revelation is complete, and that it's reverting to the only other thing it could ever possibly be about.

In point of fact, the phenomenon of a revelation becoming a religion is inevitible with psychologies such as that possessed by humans. It's okay, this is not wrong - even this event serves a function in the higher order of things. Let not the seeking of profit by the adherents of a given revelation give justification for the notion that it is untrue - this justification is false, and only serves to harm.

It is not that profit, itself, is in any way an "admirable" motive - it is not. It's just that profit, itself, isn't necessarily evil, and so can serve the purpose of letting one know whether or not a given revelation is complete. When those charged with conveying a given revelation begin turning their attention to affairs of profit or money, this means that the revelation has been completely conveyed. It doesn't mean that they've lost their way, it means only that their job is done, and they will cease to reincarnate into the cycles necessary to bring the revelation about. The first generation of Bodhisattvas to begin focusing on money are conclusively and without a doubt required to be the final generation of Bodhisattva incarnations whose contributions to and modifications of the revelation are considered cannonical.

Subsequent purveyors of the revelation may freely seek profit as they wish, they are humans and wealth and profit are natural parts of societies such as those formed by humans. What they are not permitted to do are portray themselves as authorities on the revelation whose dictates are to be considered cannonical. Anyone participating in a revelation after its opened itself up to profit-seeking who claims to have a level of authority on the revelation equivalent or even slightly comparable to those who produced the cannon are not to be trusted ever again within the confines fo the legitimate cannon. They have become deceivers - perhaps even unto themselves - and will only cause the same ruin and human suffering which such deceivers have been causing since long before you became modern humans. That they will attract followers is also inevitible.


An individual's ability to alter or contribute to the cannonical portion of a revelation is determined entirely by right of succession - one Bodhisattva conveys the authority upon a successor until the revelation is complete (i.e., when the first generation of incarnation for that Bodhisattva turns its attention to wealth or material gain, as described above).

Note that just because someone is not validated by right of succession into this revelation, it in no way, shape or form means they are not involved in some other true revelation. They may be another Bodhisattva in another work, or even the same Bodhisattva with a different Bodhisattva version of a "hobby". Nothing is invalidated as truth which is not validated by this particular revelation, so don't even pretend to go there.

After the movement makes the inevitable transition to a profit-seeking structure, as all revelations must in order to be fulfilled, support of any given profit-seeking child of the revelation is optional and left to the discernment of the seeker. It is not automatically wrong or unhealthy, it is a natural part of human society and serves its function as mentioned above. Any given child of the revelation may or may not be sincere - they will be human endeavors, and subject to the same strengths and weaknesses as humanity, itself. Only the individual seeker can determine if a profit-seeker child of a completed revelation can be trusted or is worth getting involved in. One thing you should always remember, however, is that at any stage of the revelation's lifecycle, no valid or sincere seeker can ever be permitted to pretend the authority comparable to cannonical authority without right of succession or with a profit-seeking motive. Even an individual Bodhisattva who begins its life prior to the profit-seeking phase loses its authority to alter or amend the cannon once profit-seeking has begun. This is mandatory in any valid, honest system of seeking. It is not optional, any faith declaring otherwise should be scorned by the sincere seeker and trod underfoot - it is false, artificial and empty, and every bit as worthless to the processes of life as any other artificial vacuum. Genuine "new revelations" can only come from new incarnations of a Bodhisattva and must be stated as completely unrelated to any other revelation (as this one is).


Still, such for-profit activities that evolve in the life cycle of a given revelation should not be seen as "wrong". They are not, what would be "wrong" is for them to continue making cannonical alterations beyond the point when the first donation was sought or accepted. Further, a donation need not even be sought for the revelation to be complete, it need only be accepted by the Bodhisattva conveying the revelation.

The profit-seeking phase can serve to expand knowledge and understanding of the revelation, so should not automatically be deemed as "wrong" or "unhealthy". However, care is needed with those claiming to be purveyors of the revelation beyond that point. Great caution and introspection should be exersized, and no fear should ever exist of rejecting any given offshoot for any reason or from any source.

You cannot trust cannonical alterations after a movement has transformed into a fund-seeking operation, nor can you trust alterations or dogmatic interpretations of the revelation at _ANY_ stage of the lifecycle of the revelation. While any dogmatic interpretation is likely to contain elements of validity, every revelation can only be interpreted by the seeker, not by a religious institution or one's family, friends or other elder or respected authority figures. Some degree of guidance is valid, but no valid truth will demand obedience to dogma that on any level goes against the inner workings of the seeker. They're acceptable as a starting point for learning about a given revelation, but they must not be enforced on any level in any way, shape or form once a seeker has acquired sufficient understanding to begin plotting their own course. This is, of course, where sects come from. Sects are not wrong, diverse interpretations are not wrong, what is wrong is the enforcement of these interpretations or the application of pressure upon adherents to interpret in a particular way. Modern religion is a failure in this regard, and has much to answer for in the generation of human suffering.

That aside, true assignments by Bodhisattva's will never be about money, and in the various societal contexts in which Bodhisattva's are assigned (usually a self-assignment, to be honest) to operate , any concept of "profit" or "advantage" cannot apply. If and when that concept begins flowing from those involved with revealing the movement, new revelations or canonical alterations must be discontinued and can no longer be trusted on any level. As explained above, seeking profit is not in and of itself wrong, it is simply the "timer", so to speak, which lets you know that particular revelation is "done". Seeking profit while claiming to be in the process of currently delivering the revelation - _that_ is wrong. It is deception of the worst kind which any one being can carry out upon another, and any such being is only sealing its own fate and insuring its own future darkness.

:-)

We hope this has illuminated you, and we naturally expect few actual believers. It doesn't matter, we've been doing this for quite some time - our methods are indestructible, our goals unavoidable (whether we are here or not, souls will strive towards them - all we do is make the process more efficient and likely to succeed), our influence infallible (whatever fallibility individual incarnations may end up possessing).

Feel free to ask questions, we have given you one method to verify our claims which will be incontrovertible. Societies always expect such things at this stage of the game, and at _THIS_ stage of the game, "evidence" of our relationship with the society throughout its history may be revealed.

Good luck. :-)

Evidence for the intervention of advanced knowledge throughout human history

Evidence for the involvement of technologically advanced knowledge atpoints scattered throughout human history is easy to find, and we areready to tell you how.
You've discovered molecular structure, and can operate very good 3Dmodeling systems that demonstrate their structures and behaviorsperfectly. You've also developed sophisticated 2D schematica todescribe various aspects of molecular arrangement which are very muchrelevant to what you need to know to reveal our interventionthroughout your history.
The intervention you uncover will be undeniable by any government orother organization, and this is deliberate.
The most relevant thing about the relatively recent advancements inyour understanding of molecular structure involve some of the systemsof 2D schemata much more so than any realistic 3D model - we didn'tknow you'd become so efficient at 3D so quickly, and so while this maynot be the best way for the technology you've actually managed toevolve, it was nonetheless intentional, and in some ways increases thestrength of the evidence for the connection to your past and theknowledge of molecular structure you've picked up on so quickly today.Via this connection, which will become increasingly evident the moreit is studied (and some are, naturally, already doing this, we're justgiving you an additional little pointer here), the evidence willeventually become incontrovertible that advanced technology hasexisted outside of human society for millennia. Be it technologicalsociety from humanity's own descendants, or extraterrestrialtechnology, the concept needs to be absorbed before Earth can move onmuch further in the relationship between human society and the rest ofthe sentient universe.
Study your 2D schematic structures, you should be able to intuit whichones are most likely to be relevant. You will find many of thesestructures represented blatantly in one form or another in works ofart and science throughout history, even a little bit in the humanversion of prehistory (we remember when there were dinosaurs on yourworld, so yes, we've been here awhile - some of the very same mindswho are talking to you today, not just our ancestors - hope thatdoesn't freak anyone out who is capable of believing it ). Studyalso methods for representing musical notes in 2D ways - the 5-linesystem you have is completely off the mark for the purposes we'rediscussing here, but you can intuit other methods of 2D musicalrepresentation which will eventually lead you to the discovery of 2Dmusical representation systems that convert some ancient tunes andwritings into precise molecular structures in accordance with some ofthe 2D schematic systems you've already developed today.
Good luck, we wish only the best for you. This is the evidence you'vebeen waiting for, and as you figure it out, it -will- be undeniable.